Community-submitted resources
Your link will be reviewed and considered as an addition to this page. Your research is greatly appreciated! Thank you!
Submit Article or VideoResearch
This page includes community-submitted links to various articles, studies, and videos, as well as resident speeches presented during BoC meetings.
Resources submitted by PACCOA members and community supporters.
YouTube — May 2026
The Horrifying Truth About Data Centers Nobody Is Talking AboutMan In America covers the explosive growth of AI data centers — noise pollution, water usage, surveillance infrastructure, and the cost to local residents. Approx. 12 min.
YouTube — September 2026
Data Centers: The Hidden Cost to CommunitiesA community-submitted video examining the real impact of large-scale data center development on local communities — infrastructure strain, environmental concerns, and the fight for resident rights. Approx. 27 min.
YouTube — September 2026
Community Short: Data Center ImpactA community-submitted short video on data center development and its impact on local communities. Approx. 1 min.
Statesboro Herald — September 2026
Eleven Citizens and Nonprofit Group File Legal Challenge to Statesboro Data Center RezoningPACCOA met the founder and board of Coastal Communities United at the Model Ordinance Summit held in Columbus, GA, September 11–13, 2026. This article covers their legal challenge to a data center rezoning in Statesboro — a fight that is similar to our own efforts in Paulding County.
Clean Technologies (MDPI) — August 2026
Infrasound and Low-Frequency Noise in Data Center Environments: A Narrative Review Toward Health-Protective Acoustic Design StandardsA peer-reviewed study from the University of North Texas finding that no published research has ever measured the infrasound and low-frequency noise (ILFN) spectrum of an operational data center — despite strong evidence from wind turbine, industrial, and laboratory contexts that sub-audible acoustic exposure causes sleep disturbance, cardiovascular stress, cognitive impairment, and vestibular symptoms. Standard A-weighted noise monitoring discounts these frequencies by more than 26 dB, leaving workers and neighboring communities without meaningful protection. The authors call for urgent ILFN characterization of operational facilities and new health-protective acoustic design standards.
Facebook — September 2026
The Purpose of AI Data Centers — What They're Really ForA community-shared video explaining what AI data centers are actually built to do — and why that matters for communities like ours in Paulding County.
opengridworks.com — September 2026
OpenGridWorksA community-submitted resource covering electrical grid interconnection — relevant to understanding the infrastructure demands of large-scale data center development.
September 2026
Paulding County Elected Officials' Timeline of Events
A chronological timeline of key events, meetings, and milestones in PACCOA's efforts to protect Paulding County.
August 20, 2026
Meeting with Estes — August 20, 2026
Notes from the August 20, 2026 meeting with Paulding County Board of Commissioners Chairman Estes.
August 26, 2025
Paulding County Planning Commission & Board of Commissioners — Official Meeting Agenda (August 26, 2025)
The official agenda for the Paulding County Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners meeting held August 26, 2025 (Agenda #569), published on paulding.gov. This is the meeting at which the Technology Park Overlay District text amendments were on the agenda for consideration.
June 9, 2026
A Paulding County resident addressed the Board of Commissioners on June 9, 2026, raising alarm over Switch KEEP 2.0's expansion from 126 to over 2,000 acres in neighboring Bartow County with no additional DRI review, and revealing that Switch had paid $32 million for land in Paulding County adjacent to the North Paulding school campus. The speaker described meeting a family on Bethel Church Road being displaced by a $75 million land sale to a data center developer, and warned of health impacts reported by residents near data centers nationwide. The speech also challenged the long-term economic logic of hyperscale data centers, citing China's 70–80% idle capacity and the rapid emergence of compact AI hardware, and called on the Board to represent residents over corporations.
June 23, 2026
A Paulding County resident returned to the Board of Commissioners on June 23, 2026, continuing concerns raised two weeks prior. The speaker challenged the Board on three fronts: the community's lack of meaningful input on data center proposals; the unanswered question of what 500–1,000 acre data centers are truly built for, including 24/7 AI surveillance and digital financial control; and the rapid technological obsolescence of hyperscale facilities, pointing to China's 70–80% idle data center capacity and NVIDIA's $299 compact AI supercomputers. The speech highlighted Cartersville's ~5% utility rate hikes imposed on residents after approving a Switch data center, and held Commissioners directly accountable to their own campaign pledges — quoting Chairman Estes and Commissioner Schneider by name. The speaker also urged the Board to stop granting tree-buffer variances that allow developers to clear-cut land for maximum-density housing.
July 14, 2026
A Paulding County resident of 27 years addressed the Board on July 14, 2026, presenting evidence of a pattern of deliberate secrecy surrounding the Technology Park Overlay District. The speaker documented that the August 26, 2025 "public hearing" drew zero resident speakers — only a polished presentation by Brandon Bowen, attorney for Atlas Data Center developer, who was also verified through open records requests to be actively pursuing land acquisition in Project Sweetwater/Tidwell. The speech raised questions about Bowen's newly formed LLC, Aristotelian Property, as a potential shell company for quiet land acquisition. The resident detailed two previously undisclosed private meetings: a closed April 10, 2026 Zoom session titled "Jeff Matthews" with multiple commissioners and staff, and a May 8, 2026 "Pre-Meeting for BBQ (Data Center Meeting)" in the BOC Conference Room — both held with zero public notice. The speaker argued these meetings violated the spirit and likely the letter of Georgia's Open Meetings Act, and called on the Board to immediately institute a moratorium on data center approvals until residents have a genuine voice in the process.
August 25, 2026
A Paulding County resident addressed the Board of Commissioners on August 25, 2026, raising serious concerns about the County's use of text amendments to rezone large acreage properties — a process that bypasses traditional zoning procedures and limits public participation. The speaker detailed the Pinehill Investments lawsuit, in which the County's failure to properly advertise a 2024 text amendment, failure to provide a draft for public review, and a closed-door meeting with Community Development Director Ann Lippmann were alleged to have violated the rights of developers who had invested millions in the Sheffield Highlands residential development since 2005. The case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount, with county taxpayers bearing the cost. The resident drew a direct parallel to how the Technology Park Overlay Districts were created without proper notice to surrounding property owners, and called on the BOC and Planning Commission to cease using text amendments as a rezoning mechanism.
September 22, 2026
A Paulding County resident addressed the Board of Commissioners on September 22, 2026, calling for the complete repeal of the Technology Park Overlay District. The speaker argued the overlay was created unconstitutionally — noting that the data center developer's own attorney, Brandon Bowen, drafted the text amendment while county attorneys made no documented protective edits on behalf of residents. The speech cited the absence of mailed notices, rezoning signs, or road postings, and pointed to a newly discovered ~$3 million real-estate investment on Wimberly Way under a newly formed LLC tied to a sitting Commissioner as evidence of deepening conflicts of interest. Invoking Georgia Supreme Court precedents including Cross v. Hall County and Olley Valley Estates v. Fussell, the speaker warned that the overlay constitutes illegal spot zoning and called on the Board to start over — working with citizens, not developers' attorneys — before the temporary moratorium expires.
September 2026
Georgia's corruption laws for elected officials fall under Title 16, Chapter 10 of the Georgia Code, which covers Offenses Against Public Administration. These laws define what public officials cannot do, the types of conduct considered corrupt, and the criminal penalties for violations.
Georgia's bribery statute makes it a crime both to offer an improper benefit to a public official and for the official to solicit or accept one. Key elements include: a thing of value offered or received (broadly defined — money, favors, services, advantages); a corrupt intent to influence an official act; and a clear connection to the official's public duties. A person convicted of bribery shall be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000, or by imprisonment of between 1 and 20 years, or both.
georgiacriminallaw.orgPublic officials swear an oath to uphold the Constitution and laws. Violating that oath — through intentional misconduct, neglect of duty, or corrupt acts — is a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment of between 1 and 5 years.
Justia LawThis article covers multiple forms of official misconduct. These laws target misuse of authority, falsification of official documents, and self-dealing.
Justia LawThe Georgia Attorney General's 2026 guidance emphasizes that public officers cannot request or demand personal benefit as a condition of performing their duties. Examples include:
Office of Attorney General of GeorgiaViolations of the Codes of Ethics may result in a civil fine not to exceed $10,000, restitution, and removal from office or employment.
Georgia General AssemblyAltering, stealing, embezzling, or otherwise willfully tampering with any record, process, or contract shall be guilty of a felony punishable by a term of imprisonment of not less than 2 and not more than 10 years.
Georgia General AssemblyGeorgia has prosecuted district attorneys, judges, and local officials for corruption, demonstrating active enforcement.
Georgia law is clear: public officials must serve the people, not themselves. Any act that trades official power for personal gain — or hides official actions from public scrutiny — can fall under these statutes.
Your link will be reviewed and considered as an addition to this page. Your research is greatly appreciated! Thank you!
Submit Article or Video